Misclassifying workers is one of the most expensive mistakes a staffing firm can make. What might start as an administrative oversight can quickly grow into multi-million-dollar penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruption. With federal agencies, states, and now even some cities taking a stronger stand on worker classification, the message is clear: compliance is not optional.

A Costly Example of Misclassification

In July 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Court upheld a district court ruling ordering a healthcare staffing firm to pay $9.3 million for misclassifying approximately 1,100 nurses as independent contractors. The ruling serves as a reminder that misclassification risks aren’t limited to one field. Staffing firms across every sector face the same potential exposure when worker classifications lack clear processes, documentation, and oversight.

The company had argued that its nurses operated independently because they could choose their shifts and were not required to accept assignments. The court disagreed, however, after applying the Fourth Circuit’s economic reality test. As a result, the court concluded that nurses were, in practice, employees and not independent contractors.

Why Misclassification Happens

Most misclassification issues are not typically deliberate. They often occur when firms grow quickly, expand across multiple states, or rely on outdated processes to determine worker status. Common causes include:

  • Inconsistent definitions of employee versus contractor across jurisdictions
  • An unclear understanding that shift flexibility or short-term assignments define independence
  • Pressure to meet client needs quickly, leading to classification shortcuts
  • Limited internal auditing or unclear ownership of compliance responsibilities

Even well-intentioned teams can overlook small details that make a big difference under federal or state law.

The Hidden Costs of Getting It Wrong

Misclassification can trigger more than just back wages. Staffing firms can face:

  • Tax penalties and interest from the IRS or state agencies
  • Wage and hour claims
  • Benefit disputes tied to health insurance, retirement
  • Reputational harm that affects client and candidate trust
  • Contract disputes with clients, especially when indemnity clauses apply

These costs often compound, resulting in years of litigation and legal fees that far exceed any short-term savings from how workers were originally classified.

Setting Up Safeguards for Compliance

Avoiding misclassification requires structure and consistency, not just awareness. Staffing firms can significantly reduce exposure by building internal checks that keep pace with their business growth. Practical steps include:

  • Conducting periodic audits of employment status
  • Standardizing documentation that outlines why each worker is classified as W-2 or 1099
  • Training account managers and recruiters to identify red flags early
  • Reviewing client contracts and onboarding documents to ensure they align with the actual working relationship
  • Engaging staffing-specific legal counsel to review high-risk roles and develop clear policies
  • Reviewing policies against the six economic realities test factors – control, profit/loss, investment, skill, permanence, and essentiality

These steps create a paper trail of good faith and compliance, which can make all the difference if a firm ever faces scrutiny.

Legal Guidance That Fits the Staffing Model

Misclassification prevention is not about reacting; it’s about anticipating where risk lives within your operation. A proactive legal partner who understands staffing workflows can help identify exposure before it becomes a liability.

At Staffing GC, we work exclusively with staffing firms to build classification strategies that align with evolving regulations, client agreements, and business goals. Through our subscription-based model, clients gain consistent, on-demand access to attorneys who speak staffing fluently and provide actionable guidance that protects profitability and reputation. Unlike general business attorneys, our team lives and breathes all aspects of staffing.

Contact us and partner with a legal team that helps you classify with confidence, so your focus stays where it belongs: growing your staffing business.